According to court documents, Phong operated HP Real Estate and Skye Investment LLC in Sacramento. Using these entities, Phong conspired with others to arrange for the use of wires from China to purchase residential real estate throughout the region that was intended to be converted into indoor marijuana grows. Phong is also alleged to have entered three separate marijuana manufacturing conspiracies, two with individuals charged earlier in 2018 and one with Zhen Shang Lin and Li Juan Wang. Finally, Lin and Wang are charged with international money laundering and marijuana manufacturing charges related to real estate in Yuba and Sacramento counties. Mr. Goodwin serves on the Editorial Board of the Retail Law Strategist, a publication of the International Council of Shopping Centers and is a frequent speaker and a…
In his third issue, he argues that the trial court erred in rendering judgment awarding him no attorney’s fees because he prevailed on his quantum meruit claim and was, therefore, entitled to recover his reasonable attorney’s fees. Robert Burlington is Managing Member and co-founder of the firm. In his more than 35 years of practice, he has litigated and tried to completion a wide variety of jury and non-jury trials in state and federal courts. These cases include business torts, commercial and real estate contract disputes, securities transactions, class actions, as well as many aspects of state and federal employment litigation. For more than a decade at Corboy & Demetrio, Bill has obtained numerous record-setting and multi-milli… Timothy P. Reardon is a business lawyer working with a wide array of companies—global, national and regional—in a variety of industries, including manufacturing, construction, service, distribution, health care, real estate and professional associations.
We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for a new trial. In deciding whether the parties reached an agreement, you may consider what they said and did in light of the surrounding circumstances, including any earlier course of dealing. You may not consider the parties’ unexpressed thought or intentions. Elmi testified that she never entered into an oral agreement to make Trinh a partner in Med Solutions. According to Elmi, although she and Trinh discussed the possibility of Trinh purchasing 40% of Med Solutions for $30,000, they never entered into an agreement. Elmi testified that Trinh paid her $10,000 but that she later returned the $10,000 to him.
Heather A. Salg is a Partner in our Litigation Practice Group who has tried over 50 trials and arbitrations to verdict. She primarily defends insurance companies and their insureds, as well as large self-insurers, in Federal and District Courts throughout Colorado, including where necessary in Colorado’s appellate Courts. She defends matters involving claims of bad faith and statutory delay/denial, personal injury/bodily injury, premises liability, liquor liability/dram shop, as well as… Kelly McNabb is a partner in Lieff Cabraser’s New York office. As a member of the firm’s mass tort and product liability practice group, she has represented people and families who have been injured by dangerous and defective products manufactured by medical device and pharmaceutical companies.
Testing Servs., Inc. v. Mintzer, 417 S.W.3d 691, 696 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.); W & F Transp., Inc. v. Wilhelm, 208 S.W.3d 32, 44 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.). The trial court’s duty, and ours, is to ascertain the intention of the jury’s answers, harmonize or reconcile the answers and issues, and render a judgment in conformity with them. Rice Food Mkts., Inc. v. Ramirez, 59 S.W.3d 726, 733 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 2001, no pet.) (citing State v. Hale, 146 S.W.2d 731, 739 ). “To do so, we may examine the record in order to ascertain the jury’s intent.” Mintzer, 417 S.W.3d at 696.
Trinh’s expert witness, Paul Simon, testified that Trinh’s attorney’s fees based on the contingency fee agreement entered into between Trinh and Simon’s firm was either $277,084 or $295,307, depending on the damages award, or $244,283.75 based on his firm’s hourly rates. He further testified that the firm’s costs were $13,943.09, and that $25,000 was a reasonable appellate fee. Lawofsurprise.in/ann-phong-attorney The law office of Ann Phong has been in existence ruger air hawk elite 2 problems for more than 80 years, and since the late 1800s, Phong has been a well-respected and respected attorney in the Washington, DC area. She is an avid reader of the news and has written several successful books to help her clients navigate the law in a variety of cases and matters. Mr. Robb is past President of the Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys . Steven K. Deutsch is a graduate of New York University and earned his law degree from the University of Miami.
He has a passion for taking on cases that involve the abuse of… Guy’s practice also includes representing individual and corporate fiduciaries in a broad range of trust, estate and probate disputes. Over the course of his career, Guy has successfully repre… Overview As a shareholder in Reinhart’s Corporate Law and International Practices and member of the firm’s multidisciplinary Commercial and Competition Law Group, Catherine L. Davies has an extensive business law practice focused on international and domestic transactional matters. Cathy works closely with clients on purchase and sale transactions, joint ventures, distributor and sales representative agreements and other commercial issues.